PRESS RELEASE
EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY
CONTACTS
SENT: June 8, 2009
Marta Grunlund
Sharon Sato - secretary
Voice: 425-556-2311
ParksAndTrailsCommission@Redmond.gov
Vacancy on Redmond Parks and Trails Commission
Redmond, WA – The City has one opening on the Parks and Trails Commission that
must be filled by a person living outside the city limits but with a Redmond address. Experience as an
equestrian is desired. If you fill that criteria and think Redmond’s parks and recreation are high priorities, you are invited to apply.
- Press Release, Marta Grunlund, Communications, City of Redmond, 6/8/09
ONLY COUNTY RESIDENTS WITH EQUESTRIAN INTERESTS NEED APPLY. by
_______________________________________________________________________
OPINION
Updated, 6/9. In sum: if you live in Redmond and don't have equestrian experience you won't fit the Park & Trail Commission's criteria so don't waste your time applying (even if you are a mountain-biker interested in trail connections.)
The
Parks & Trails (P&T) Commission is over-regulated! It is composed of 9 commissioners, two (2) of which must NOT live in Redmond. This policy is unpublished by the Commission and cannot be found on the City web site. That's not fair to interested parties. The only way I discovered the Commission's exclusive policy was by attending a few P&T Meetings. (Meetings are not televised and I couldn't find the regulation in P&T summary minutes.)
Yes, Redmond has a rich history of equestrian culture and it's clear the Commission wants to honor the horse culture, rightly so. But, is it fair to the 50,000 tax-paying residents of Redmond to allocate almost 25% of our P&T commissioner representation to one single interest group? Can Redmond & the county's horse culture, equestrian trails, pony clubs, etc. be so valuable as to consume almost 1/4 of our Commission's resources?
Survey results from the recent 6-year Park Planning public meetings would shed light on the interest level of residents wanting more horse trail connections. In review of the meetings, equestrian-specific trails actually seemed well down the list on the survey and barely made the radar at the last commission meeting.
Yes, our horse culture and future horse trail connections are important & valuable to Redmond, but a 22% requirement for non-resident commissioners is a bit much, don't you think? A policy recommending equestrian interest would be more empowering to the commission than a requirement.
Other Commissions - full disclosure of commissioner requirements on the city
website, RC-TV, or the public media for all commissions is lacking, except for the Planning Commission.
The
Arts Commission is composed of nine (9) commissioners and two
may be selected from outside the city limits but with a Redmond address. (no requirements, no special interests). Attracting Redmond business owners experienced in the arts, who live outside city limits, is a valid Art Commission policy. For example, look at the value Clint McCune brings to the commission, as owner of Soul Food. Without a non residency
requirement the Arts Commission policy is more flexible and empowering for it's commissioners.
The
Planning Commission is composed of seven (7) commmissioners. All
must reside within the city limits. Staff confirmed this under "comments".
final draft