Councilmember Jessica Forsythe authored Resolution No. 1634 Opposing Initiative No. 638, relating to Participation in Athletics at K-12 Schools.
Initiative Measure No. 638 concerns participation in athletics at K-12 schools. This measure would prohibit students it defines as “biologically male” from competing in certain school athletic activities intended for female students only. It would require verification of biological sex by students’ healthcare providers. Should this measure be enacted into law? Yes[ ] No
Council President Melissa Stuart said the process for placing Forsythe's resolution on the agenda was outside "Council norms" and recommended a more thorough study and review for future controversial initiatives. Stuart said Initiative resolutions are an acceptable legislative "tool." In a press release she goes onto say: "As City Council, we have a responsibity to protect the rights of the people we serve."
Do we really need Council to "protect our rights?" Should our Council (and Mayor) be telling us how to vote?
Public reach, notice and process was poor. Public testimonies and Council action occured after 11PM, late in the evening. Only 6 citizens gave testimony and all were in favor of Forsythe's resolution to oppose Initiative No. 638. Not one citizen was there to speak against the resolution.
The Forsythe's resolution passed unanimously with focus on the transgender community, city values of inclusion, and privacy.
YouTube of Council's resolution deliberation starts at 2:58:30 https://www.youtube.com/live/YsJtfph7eYE?si=9LWhQU8AH1-7B-tB
Jessica Forsythe is running against Amy Walen for seat No. 2 in the 48th Legislative District.
-- Bob Yoder, Updated -10/26/26, Source: Council Business meeting Agenda 10/20 page 7.







