Affordable Housing – A Regional Approach to a complex Problem

Over the last year, I’ve been doing a lot of reading, listening and thinking about the problem of crushingly high housing costs in our region. With the support of my colleagues at the County Council and the County Executive, last year I sponsored a motion creating a regional task force of elected officials from around King County to study the regional parameters of this challenge and come up with regional approaches to address it. We kicked this work off this summer, and it will continue for about the next year.
In the process of pulling this affordable housing task force together, I have heard the following type of comment several times: “We don’t need a task force. We know what the problem is and we know how to fix it. We just need X.” In these discussions, “X” is the one approach – or at least the predominant approach – that will solve the problem. For some people, “X” is increased investment in government-subsidized affordable housing. For some, it is regulatory reform around growth management rules that prevent suburban sprawl. For others, it is the political will to change land use rules to allow significantly more infill development. For still others, increased mandatory inclusionary zoning — requiring higher levels of affordable housing units in every new development or payments. Accessory dwelling units. Tiny houses. Transit oriented development. Condominium liability reform. “We’ve just got to put a stop to all this growth.” The list goes on.
I believe that if any one approach, or even any one type of approach, to this kind of a complex problem would more or less “solve” it, we’d be on our way to a solution by now. Yet costs to own and rent a home in our county continue to spike. As H.L. Mencken famously said: “For every complex problem, there is a solution that is concise, clear, simple and wrong.”