The statement that the Redmond Pool is "failing" and on "life support" is part of the City's campaign to convince us that the old pool at the top of the hill needs to be replaced by a big, shiny, vibrant Community Center in the downtown.
What part of the pool is failing? It doesn't leak. The ceiling isn't caving in. In fact, the pool is in excellent condition - given that it's 44 years old. Spending $100,000 to keep it operating is a bargain.
In contrast, a new community and aquatic center would cost $70,000,000. If the City sold 30-year bonds to cover construction costs, the community center would cost more than $3 MILLION PER YEAR for the next 30 years just to pay off the bonds for the building.
Annual operating costs for the community and aquatic center could be more than $1,000,000 per year and would only be partially offset by user fees. Redmond taxpayers would have to make up the difference. We would need a Municipal Parks District with taxing authority (up to $.75/thousand) in order to fund the operation of the pool/community center.
The Redmond Pool isn't glamorous or fancy, but it has provided swimming lessons for thousands of children over the years at a reasonable price. The pool has also provided a venue for swim meets, lap swim, open swim, water aerobics, pool parties and even scuba diving and kayaking lessons.
The pool is centrally located at the top of Education Hill - across from Redmond High School where pool patrons can find ample free parking in the high school parking lot when school is not in session (after 2 PM, on weekends and during the summer.) High school students can walk to swim team practice right after school without the need for car or bus transportation. Buses that bring students from other schools for swim meets have no trouble finding parking.
The downtown has grown significantly since 2011 when the community center was first proposed. It has become crowded and congested with inadequate parking for current residents and businesses. The community center would need its own multilevel parking garage and even that would not be adequate. (Try finding a parking place at the library or on the street any afternoon!)
Updating the Redmond Pool by building a small addition with better locker rooms, wading pools and therapeutic pools would be far more cost efficient. Hartman Park has plenty of room for the pool building expansion. Keeping the pool at its current location next to Hartman Park would make the pool more accessible to everyone because of the availability of parking.
Maybe it's time to rethink the City's plan to add a Community and Aquatics Center to the downtown.
Shari Wilson
What part of the pool is failing? It doesn't leak. The ceiling isn't caving in. In fact, the pool is in excellent condition - given that it's 44 years old. Spending $100,000 to keep it operating is a bargain.
In contrast, a new community and aquatic center would cost $70,000,000. If the City sold 30-year bonds to cover construction costs, the community center would cost more than $3 MILLION PER YEAR for the next 30 years just to pay off the bonds for the building.
Annual operating costs for the community and aquatic center could be more than $1,000,000 per year and would only be partially offset by user fees. Redmond taxpayers would have to make up the difference. We would need a Municipal Parks District with taxing authority (up to $.75/thousand) in order to fund the operation of the pool/community center.
The Redmond Pool isn't glamorous or fancy, but it has provided swimming lessons for thousands of children over the years at a reasonable price. The pool has also provided a venue for swim meets, lap swim, open swim, water aerobics, pool parties and even scuba diving and kayaking lessons.
The pool is centrally located at the top of Education Hill - across from Redmond High School where pool patrons can find ample free parking in the high school parking lot when school is not in session (after 2 PM, on weekends and during the summer.) High school students can walk to swim team practice right after school without the need for car or bus transportation. Buses that bring students from other schools for swim meets have no trouble finding parking.
The downtown has grown significantly since 2011 when the community center was first proposed. It has become crowded and congested with inadequate parking for current residents and businesses. The community center would need its own multilevel parking garage and even that would not be adequate. (Try finding a parking place at the library or on the street any afternoon!)
Updating the Redmond Pool by building a small addition with better locker rooms, wading pools and therapeutic pools would be far more cost efficient. Hartman Park has plenty of room for the pool building expansion. Keeping the pool at its current location next to Hartman Park would make the pool more accessible to everyone because of the availability of parking.
Maybe it's time to rethink the City's plan to add a Community and Aquatics Center to the downtown.
Shari Wilson
