The Sammamish Rowing Association (SRA) is a fantastic public asset for city and county residents wishing to take up the sport. Hundreds of youth and adults take classes every year to learn how to scull and crew on beautiful Lake Sammamish.
This popular and growing sport has needed more boathouse space for its "shells". exercise equipment and operations for years. Unfortunately, land use permitting by the county and city have delayed the project for many more years!
On June 2 the City Council held a restricted, closed public hearing so SRA and an opposing citizen could explain their case. The opponent did most all of the talking as Council had to decide if they would deny the city use permit based on the citizen's complaints. Ms. Dickson lives across the street from SRA and her primary motivation was traffic and adequate parking. She also tried to make a case for environmental damage from wetland destruction.
SRA was well prepared: 1) a left hand turn lane will be installed on Lake Sammamish Blvd. My whole family rowed at SRA and we know this improvement is critical for safety. 2) at least 15 more parking spots will be installed. 3) traffic mitigation is required, including car pooling, 3) the 12,000 sf boathouse footprint remains 150 feet from the lake, 4) a smaller wetland would be upgraded to the highest level of importance and value - Category One, and 5) hazardous wastes would be self-contained. Council approved the use permit, 7 - 0. A credit to the Mayor, it was the most professional and fairest closed-record Hearing from Council I've seen in five years. But, the appeals process is unfair.
Comment: Council's land use appeal policy : The City Council's land use appeals process (read this story & "comments") is outdated and has been abandoned by almost every city around us. The Boathouse permit is a case in point, as follows: 1) Council was not allowed to walk the site or talk to anyone about the SRA project; yet, Councilman Cole informed me last week he has known Ms. Dickson for years. 2) Neither parties involved nor the community was fully heard or represented by this rigid Review. 3) The code is confusing. Ms. Dickson, the opponent, missed out in filing a "Letter of Reconsideration" to Council and lost a rare opportunity to be heard by Council. She received no representation or assistance from her elected representatives during the Review. Almost all cities leave the judging up the to the justices of county court and free Council to represent and assist their elected. Redmond Council policy is an outlier, leaving them vulnerable to law suit.
The Sammamish Rowing Association website: http://www.srarowing.com/
Diagrams and description of the new Boathouse: http://www.srarowing.com/newboathouse/newboathouse.aspx
This Ordinance was approved by City Council to permit the use of a new Boathouse by the Sammamish Rowing Association. This document shows a map of the project.
Read over 11 comments (some from Councilmembers Carson and Allen) on the city's controversial land use appeal process.
I've observed exceptional vetting and leniency of time for opposing speakers in the last two quaisi-judicial closed-record hearings, counting this one. Mayor Marchione and the city lawyer, Jim Haney, almost overdid it in the Richardson Amendment Rezone hearing last night. The Hearing went on for hours, to 11:30pm without resolution. Action was postponed to October to begin a separate Open Public Hearing on a concommitent (development) issue!!
ReplyDeleteMs. Richardson's project proposal has already been dragged out 2 years and now she has to wait another 5 months, without an end in sight. Redmond's quasi-judicial land use review process is unweildy and protracted. If Ms. Richardson or opponent needed to appeal, the decision would be delayed further... for months or years.
500 citizens, 6 councilmembers, the Mayor, and Camwest developer marched through Perrigo Heights Plat in 2003. Scores attended the closed-record hearing on the Steep Slope Exception. That meeting ended in less time than the SRA Boathouse Type II hearing and the Richardson Ammendment hearing. And, there were no postponements or new Hearings. What's going on?
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete