Showing posts with label affordable housing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label affordable housing. Show all posts

Monday, March 3, 2008

My favorite budget priority: "I want a sense of community and connection with others."

The council and Marchione administration are trying a new tack to involve the public in creating a respectable budget for the next two years. It's called "Budgeting by Priorities". [video clip of Mayor Marchione & Pres. McCormick at bottom.]

I went to the first public meeting last Thursday. It was kinda fun. The focus of the meeting was to learn about 6 Budget Priorities that were picked by a Focus Group of 40 citizens and Council. The council chambers were almost full at the meeting. We all had a chance to pick our favorite Priority and talk about it in group breakouts.

I selected the priority group: "I WANT A SENSE OF COMMUNITY AND CONNECTION WITH OTHERS". I look at my blog as a way to connect the neighbors with each other and the city and schools. I also like the network of trails that connect developments to parks and schools and roads. With a good trail system, fewer cars (& less congestion) are needed for student commutes; more bicycles are used for errands. And especially, trails and parks are synonymous with lower health costs & increased productivity.

Korby Parnel, a planning commissioner, has been a long-time advocate of city-wide WI-FI. I like the concept too, for convenience, more opportunities to connect with others, and less commuting "home" or to the office to get "hooked in". Some citizens recommended a more comprehensive web site to connect the neighborhoods. Later, I discovered Communications Program Manager, Ms. Gronlund just built-out a Neighborhood site (here)!

My final strategic thought was to keep families connected by expanding housing choices. "Mother-in-law" housing -- also known as ADU's help to keep handicapped or dependent families under one roof. Seniors and boomerang kids is another group that benefit. One citizen reminded us that affordable housing is more likely when buildings are allowed to add an extra story.

It appeared the bulk of the folks in my group were interested in arts and theatre and culture. Many arts commissioners were present,including Tom Flynn, Chair of the arts commission and Mary, the arts staffer. I thought the best idea we agreed upon as a group was one recommended by Tom. He suggested an indoor gathering place similar in concept to the Crossroads Mall. Every weekend live music is played by a different group, kids and adults dance (my favorite attraction), "sidewalk" chess is played, large food court, and a New York style open newspaper rack and bookstore. Tom suggested a public-private partnership. A developer savvy citizen said the X-Roads mall worked, in part, because it was surrounded by high density residential. Good point. Several Arts commissions had brought up Cleveland Ave. for a location idea. With several 6 story residential buildings going up on Cleveland Avenue soon, commissioners may have hit the mark for a mall location?!! Promenades came up briefly, too.

One gentleman recommended we add a 7th Priority addressing aspects of "CIVIC PRIDE". I think it's a great idea! Do you? The 6 Priorities are listed below:

Priorities:
1) I want a well-maintained city whose infrastructure keeps pace with growth.
2) I want to live,learn,work, and play in a clean and green environment.
3) I want a sense of community and connection with others.
4) I want to be safe where I live, learn, work and play.
5) I want a diverse and vibrant range of businesses in Redmond.
6) I want a city government that is responsible and responsive to its residents and businesses.

Is there a place for "civic pride" here? What's our city signature? "Who are we"? How do we budget for it? Is our city "signature" the bicycle capital of the NW? Digital art? Parks & trails? Natural areas? What are we proud of in Redmond and how do we express it?






4 minute clip of Council President Nancy McCormick and Mayor John Marchione talking it up at the 3/4 meeting. The next, last and most important meeting is April 24.

Friday, February 29, 2008

Community Indicator Trend data will be used to help prioritize the budget.


(See a correction in red)
Staffer Jeff Churchill presented fascinating "Community Indicator" trend data at the 2/26 joint council-planning commission meeting. This trend data helps council and the administration -

  • track the progress towards goals

  • prioritize budgetary needs

  • is a tool the Chamber of Commerce uses in working with businesses.
Planning Commissioner Parnell found the trend data very valuable and interesting. Most of the housing indicator trends can be used to help prioritize our budget; to open access to affordable housing -- especially for Seniors and adult children looking for their first apartment or home.

Trends showed the housing price / income ratio increased from 4.9 in 1997 to 7.7 today. That's a 36% increase in housing costs over 11 years with income constant! Indicator trends also demonstrate a 6.2% rise in the price of a home in 2007 AND four consecutive 6% annual increases in years prior. Any citizen involved in the "Results Team" for prioritizing our budget would have to look hard at these skyrocketing housing trends and the abilitiy of working citizens to make housing payments.

At the March 4th Council Meeting "Consent Agenda", council will be approving funding to facilitate several families with housing assistance. Council will allocate $40,000 to "Friends of Youth" in Kirkland to build transitional housing for young adults leaving foster care, between 18-25. A case manager will be on site full time. (detail here) Council will also be asked to allocate $25,000 to build six transitional family housing units in Kirkland. Council will consent approval (details here) of $55,000 for our annual share of ARCH's budgetary needs. ( 13 other cities make proportionate contributions to ARCH - our Eastside Housing Dept.). Over the years ARCH has built 0ver 710 affordable housing units in Redmond city limits. All cities combined received 2300 units - Redmond has fared well. Finally, a 'document recording fee" will raise $3M county-wide for primarily capital costs of housing assistance.

Stream Water Quality trends are measured every year to indicate the health of our environment. Surveys taken between 2004 and 2005 showed "marginal" quality readings of 40 (out of 100). In 2006-2007 measurements were sporadically better in a few places but no stormwater outfall measurements were taken. Stormwater contains the most contaminated water. From a budgetary standpoint, I would hope the Results Team will budget for tertiary bio-filtration treatment at the new Bear Creek regional outfall and at the main trunk outfall at Luke McRedmond Park. Will swirl, media and wetland filtration alone keep water quality readings above 40? Copper and oil run-off from the 520 eight lane widening project will stress water quality measurements even further.

The commerce indicator measurements trended good. Our share of regional employment dipped to 81,844 in 2006 but we were still above forecast. Regional employment in 2005 was 82,073.

Mary, an arts staffer prepared an indicator measurement for "cultural and performance arts" which showed a dramatic increase in attendance to Art Commission sponsored events.

The final "community indicator" document will be published in April and available to the public.







Thursday, February 28, 2008

Attn: Boomers - Where in Redmond will our children and parents live when they need housing?


Housing availability for families in Redmond is approaching crisis levels for those who don't have the higher income tech or professional related jobs. This is especially true for our children seeking their first home or apartment and for Seniors over the age of 75. Believe it or not, the population of baby boomer's parents are the fastest growing demographic in Redmond, yet they (and their grandchildren) have the smallest disposable income! Unless we do something to create affordable family housing, many Redmond's young adults and seniors may have to move or abandon their plans to live with their families in Redmond.

Reasonable access to housing is perhaps even more severe for the blue collar worker, low tech worker or lower paid professionals like teachers and salesmen. Already many of these working families are commuting from Monroe, Kent, and other outlying cities to service Redmond residents. As the price of oil increases to $100/barrel will they be able to afford their commute? Growth in Redmond and services could slow and even suffer from lack of workers.

I remember ex-mayor Ives once envisioning Redmond evolving into "another Stamford, Connecticut" where most residents are affluent and and serviced by surrounding communities and extensive mass transit. Do we want our city to be like another Stamford -- lacking in economic diversity?

Last Tuesday, the Planning Commissioners, Council and Mayor tried to address some of these issues. Mayor Marchione stated that we can't solve the worker-commute problem just by building roads and mass transit. Mayor Marchione encouraged staff, council and planning commission to work with Arthur Sullivan, Program Manager of ARCH (our eastside housing department) to create affordable family housing inside Redmond. Adding affordable housing inside Redmond would also help to reduce the traffic congestion problem!

We are certainly not having a problem building $1 million homes AND those homes will need services! 800 million $ homes will soon be built at Redmond Ridge East. 3500 expensive new housing units are scheduled for Redmond Ridge and 3000 expensive units are scheduled in North Redmond over the next 5-10 years. We need to make sure ARCH gets the support it needs to facilitate modest housing for the service workers we need IN Redmond!

ARCH has already funded 737 housing units for Redmond from their multi-city ARCH Trust Fund. Over $6M in Trust Funds have been dedicated to Redmond families and residents in need of housing support. If you have friends or family looking for affordable condos and houses click here: http://www.archhousing.org/ownership/owner_ops_text.html.

Councilmembers Cole, McCormick, Vache and Allen were all pleased with how Redmond has led the Region through efforts of ARCH. Council will decide during their next meeting to approve by consent $65000 for the Trust Fund to build transitional housing for foster-children. How would you vote? Decent priced housing for decent people & workers is something we certainly need! Comments?

The ARCH website is http://www.archhousing.org/.

Friday, January 11, 2008

Our "Western Gateway view corridor" is harmed by a new project


Redmond's Western Gateway view corridor and "wooded hillside" assets are blocked off by the new "ElementRedmond" townhouse project. 15-20 foot setbacks don't help the look.

"Gateway View Corridors" are a similar yet different issue from "Shoreline View Corridors." Have you seen the "ElementRedmond Townhome" project just west of Willows Road on Redmond Way? For affluent Redmond, WA. they look "affordable" but at $400,000 and up? Though not near a "shore", this project seriously harms Redmond's Western Gateway view corridor. I gag every time I drive down Rose Hill and see this massive cluster of "mega-town homes". We need new housing and ElementRedmond has nice amenities, but at this 'price'? Click on the link above to learn more about them.

These tall, angular structures, seem to jut out at you. Worse, they completely block the views we once had of the green wooded hillsides of Education Hill and North Redmond. Thin setbacks leave virtually no room for vegetative buffering. These structures, "3-deep" with garaged parking, appear to be set-back only 15 feet from Redmond Way sidewalk! Prepare for increased traffic congestion on Rose Hill a year from now.

The above pictures tell the story...or take a drive down Rose Hill. How on God's Green Earth could we allow this "WALL" of structures blocking public the scenic views of our wooded hillside city asset? (ref: Guy Michaelson, Berger Partners, Seattle)

Is it time for the city to amend zoning and design standards to protect our public view Gateway and Shoreline corridors from mega-projects and mega-homes?
Or would you prefer just to leave public view corridors unregulated, with the market deciding how far property owners will go with obstructive, intrusive buildings?
What are your thoughts? Any comments?