2002 manhole public art |
On May 8th council discussed a much greater emphasis of art in their budget. Major projects like Buoyant in the Down Park need funding. It will cost >3% of the total park construction. The present grass and concrete downtown park is of course better than another one or two 6-8 story rental buildings. A "landmark" art installation like Buoyant near the pavilion would make it a true park and sparkle our downtown.
"Signature" art installations are needed too. They would cost 2-3% of total constructions costs at places like the main streets of Overlake, the Marymoor Village gateway, key public buildings or high traffic parks or trails like the Connector Trail Signals art.
Then there is the "Hallmark" public works art funded currently at 1% of construction costs. It's scattered all over the city and few probably notice it. However, if you look hard you can't complain about the cement-colored salmon hidden under the Redmond Way bridge. Here's the ultimate... "Rosemary Ives" leaf art on a manhole cover celebrating the installation of a traffic calming improvement on our street.
Per the Administration, if council approves the new art ordinance -- to make our city more livable and lively -- the average investment in public art would increase from $188,778 per biennium to approximately $370,000. Is this asking too much?
No comments:
Post a Comment
COMMENT HERE - COMMENTS ARE MODERATED