Cost
vs. Value -- Portables at LWSD
By Paige Norman
As you drive by Redmond Middle School and Redmond High School this summer; make sure you count the number of portable buildings on site at each school. RMS will be adding one more portable; and RHS will have an additional two; bringing the total to 7 between the two schools. Read More >>
As you drive by Redmond Middle School and Redmond High School this summer; make sure you count the number of portable buildings on site at each school. RMS will be adding one more portable; and RHS will have an additional two; bringing the total to 7 between the two schools. Read More >>
I
asked Kathryn Reith, Communications Director at Lake Washington School district for the cost
of the new addition at Redmond High School (the brick building that faces 104th)
and the cost for each of the portable units including all
related expenses (permits, furniture, painting, etc.).
Her answer:
“With regard to classroom cost, here’s the answer:
“With regard to classroom cost, here’s the answer:
·
Per permanent
classroom cost (this is for the addition) = $728,484
·
Per portable
classroom cost = $190,000 (*each portable is actually a double-classroom, so
this figure per portable is $380,000)”
There
is an additional portable that will be added to Redmond Middle School –
bringing the total to three on-site.
This portable will be used for classrooms as the school needs
“additional space”.
By
my count this means three portables at RMS and four portables at RHS:
7 portables at $380,000 cost per (double)
portable = $2,660,000 total cost (14 classrooms)
Let’s
focus solely on the additional portables at Redmond High School which would be
just 4 portables at $380,000 each (Total $1,520,000). This adds an additional 8 classrooms to the
RHS campus in portable buildings.
Redmond
High School was originally built in 1964; demolished and rebuilt during the
LWSD modernization process (Phase 2) in 2003.
The modernization updated the
1964 school from student capacity of 1,375 to the 2003 capacity of between 1431
and 1500 (specialized classes and ELL have different class and population
capacities). The budget for the 2003 construction
was $50,575,931.
Page
11 of History of LWSD states:
• 1965 – Redmond – A new Redmond High School
was opened on Education Hill and Redmond students returned to this high school.
With 134,294 square feet of floor space in three buildings the cost was $2.2
million. Walter Seabloom was the first principal in the new school. Remodeling
was done in 1984 and 1985.” http://www.lwsd.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/About-Us/HistoryofLWSD.pdf
The
construction completed in 2012 added 30,000 sf of space and included an
auxiliary gym addition and a classroom addition. http://www.lwsd.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/For-The-Community/Construction/RHS/Neighborhood-meeting-4-21-2011.pdf According
to Kathryn Reith’s figures above, the cost for the classroom addition was
$728,484 of the $1,400,000 construction budget cost listed. 14 classrooms are housed in the brick addition;
all classrooms were used in one way or another throughout the school year.
Each
portable building houses two classrooms – for a total of 8 classrooms on the
RHS campus. A class size is based on a
32 student capacity; although some classes may have more or less than that
number. Capacity is no different for a
portable vs. standard classroom. 8
classrooms with an average of 32 students per classroom is a total of 256 seats
available.
14
classrooms for $728,484 (cost of the building) vs. 8 classrooms for $1,520,000 (four portables)
Let’s
assume the district decided to double the size of the 2011 addition; using the
cost of the 14 classroom structure it would have cost roughly $1,456,968. WELL BELOW
the cost of installing four “double” portable buildings for one school and with six more classrooms than are currently
available.
Could
the district have built the 2003 RHS campus with capacity for the future? Certainly!
LWSD states in their modernization information that schools being built
are theoretically intended for use for 40 years. Modernization projects began in 1998 and will
continue until 2033 (http://www.lwsd.org/For-Community/School-Construction/Modernization/Pages/Modernization-Program-Basics.aspx.
Would
this completely avoid the need for portables?
In the long term probably not; however portables have a shorter
life-span than a brick-and-mortar building and would need to be replaced and
repaired more frequently.
Buildings
should be planned, designed and built for long-term use and for many
generations of students.
There
is a projected increase of roughly 4,000 students coming into the district in
the next 10 years (http://www.lwsd.org/News/News-and-Announcements/Pages/Lake-Washington-School-District-Predicts-Enrollment-Growth.aspx). Redmond Mayor John Marchione expects Redmond
to grow from a city of 56,000 to 78,000 (http://redmondcity.blogspot.com/2013/05/redmond-mayor-marchione-gives-state-of.html) Although many of the new housing developments
are apartments and other multi-family buildings intended for the younger,
single or no-kids couples; there are far too many places to live in Redmond
when matched against the number of schools and classrooms available for
incoming children.
LWSD is guilty of not adequately projecting the school-age population increase in a growing and thriving community for the future. They have consistently discounted growth trends in the last 10 years with Redmond Junior High (now Redmond Middle School), Horace Mann Elementary and Redmond (Senior) High School; not to mention Rosa Parks Elementary in the Redmond Ridge neighborhood. Of course, they can’t be certain to the letter of the number of students coming into a district, but with all the media attention the district receives about awards of distinction and test scores; calculations should be over-planned instead of conservatively placed in the lower estimates. In addition, the cities and the District should work together to develop communication about future residential projects and how many projected school-age children those developments could bring.
LWSD is guilty of not adequately projecting the school-age population increase in a growing and thriving community for the future. They have consistently discounted growth trends in the last 10 years with Redmond Junior High (now Redmond Middle School), Horace Mann Elementary and Redmond (Senior) High School; not to mention Rosa Parks Elementary in the Redmond Ridge neighborhood. Of course, they can’t be certain to the letter of the number of students coming into a district, but with all the media attention the district receives about awards of distinction and test scores; calculations should be over-planned instead of conservatively placed in the lower estimates. In addition, the cities and the District should work together to develop communication about future residential projects and how many projected school-age children those developments could bring.
In 2014, LWSD will once again ask for more money to finance
modernization and upgrades to existing schools.
This money will be used towards “Phase 3” schools http://www.lwsd.org/For-Community/School-Construction/Modernization/Pages/Future-Phases.aspx
including Juanita High School and Rockwell Elementary. If the “Phase 2” modernizations have required
portables and additions within 10 years of construction; how will the district
address the increase of students in the next 20 to 30 years?
Is it really more expensive
to build larger structures than are currently needed for new schools and have 3
or 4 (or even a few more) classrooms sit empty for the next 10 years? Is it of value to the taxpayer to have to band-aid
enrollment issues every year because of poor planning by the district? Does the District truly expect the voters to
approve yet another bond issue so they can waste more time and more money on
buildings that are crowded before they’ve even been completed?
I urge you to carefully consider your vote in the 2014 levy
process.
By Paige Norman
Redmond resident and LWSD parent
Author of "Paiges Prattle" blog
Remember that the district gave the dire warning that if voters didn't approve the 2011 levy to build additions at Redmond High School and Eastlake High School that students would end up in portables? It turned out that all along the construction plans for the RHS Addition included site preparation for 10 portables next to the bus lanes. In Sept 2012, RHS opened with the new addition and 2 portables already on site.
ReplyDeletePortables are ugly and they isolate students from the rest of the school. The portables at RHS take up a lot of space on what was once a nice field. The site prep alone for the 10 RHS portables cost more than a million dollars - and then there was the cost of each portable.
The district currently has 140 portables. It projects 4000 new students in the next 10 years. They are asking voters to approve the 2014 Bond Measure to add space for the 4000 new students. And then they tell us that they're adding portables because they don't want to "over build" and end up with too much space! Do they listen to themselves talk?
Both Redmond High School and Redmond Middle School were at capacity for 2012-2013 with more overcrowding expected when classes start this fall. Halls are crowded. Lunchroom, library and restroom facilities are inadequate - and more students will end up in portables. It's too bad since taxpayers have spent a lot of money over the past 15 years on new buildings all over the district. Students deserve better than portables.
Here's an idea - the Washington Cathedral Site at the corner of NE 124th Street and Redmond-Woodinville Road is for sale. It includes a 50,000 square foot building on 15.5 acres for $19,500,000. The district normally spends $60 million on a new middle school - built on land that the district already owns. The Washington Cathedral Site includes the building and the land. The 6-Year Capital Facilities Plan shows that the district is budgeting $98,000,000 of the upcoming bond measure for property acquisition and construction of a new middle school that would be ready in 2018. The Washington Cathedral Site could be used as a new middle school. Or it could be used as a K-8 to address overcrowding at Redmond Middle School, Rockwell and Einstein that has been created as the whole North Redmond Corridor is developed into new houses that will add lots of new students. What's great about Washington Cathedral is that it's already built so it could be ready for students in about 2 years. (The district would need to ask Redmond to rezone it for school use and do some remodeling and some traffic mitigation. And if the district provided efficient bussing for all eligible students and started classes at 9:15 AM, traffic would be manageable.) The site is also easily accessible to east Kirkland and the north Avondale area students. How to pay for it? The school district owns 9 acres at the corner NE 122nd Street & 172nd Avenue NE that it could sell for about $9,000,000. (The district is planning to put an elementary school on this site using $34,000,000 from the 2014 bond measure, but do we really need another elementary school half-way between Rockwell and Einstein?) The district also needs to sell 20 acres in the Bear Creek basin and has small surplus parcels around the district that it could sell.
The district needs space for students in Redmond NOW and the Washington Cathedral Site would easily provide classroom space at a bargain price.
It's just an idea.