Thank you for writing me and voicing your concern over the proposed $20 car tabs fee.
As you may have read, a vote on the “congestion reduction fee” was expected to take place at the July 25th Council meeting. Instead, this vote was unexpectedly delayed until August 15th. I still oppose a councilmanic adoption of the $20 car tab increase. Further, I am concerned by the fact that the $20 fee will still result in a reduction of bus service for the Eastside and that Metro has not fully implemented plans to control its ongoing budget growth.
As a firm supporter of transit, I have said consistently through this debate that I have many concerns about Metro’s future. First, as I mentioned above, significant route eliminations and reductions on the Eastside will occur even if the car tab fee is implemented. These service hours will be allocated elsewhere. Eastsiders will ultimately be paying for service they will not receive. Second, long term solutions for Metro’s future have yet to be discussed. The fee doesn’t solve the underlying issues and uses important reserves to fill-in budget holes.
I don’t think it’s responsible to my constituents in District 6, nor the people of King County, to endorse a weak “band-aid” solution. Again, thank you for writing. Let me know if you have any additional questions or concerns. I look forward to continuing this debate.
Sincerely,
HI Bob, Jan Hague is anti-tax and anti-Metro, so her anti-matter is not a surprise to me.
ReplyDeleteAs you know, traffic in King County is terrible. R-TRIP is a good example of agencies and businesses working together to reduce traffic congestion. See our blog at http://www.gortripblog.com/2011/02/50-commuters-win-25-each-in-january-promotion/
-- email by reader neighbor
Agree with Jane's stance.
ReplyDeleteNot to mention it is ridculous to charge people additional funds that do not even use metro. Increase the bus fare and let the users pay for it.
More Metro waste paid for through an unfair tax that was never up for a vote.
ReplyDelete